RSS

December 31st, 2010 - 5.21.pm § in Canadian, History, Mixology

Oh Canada!

This story was recently published (in German) in Mixology Magazine.

Canadian whiskies have long been synonymous with rye in the mind of the public – because traditionally, rye was the predominant grain in the mash bill. But along the way the rye percentage dropped and the corn percentage rose. Most Canadian whiskies still use rye to an extent, but the lowered rye percentage has created a category that is largely unexciting – especially to the mixology community.

Classic Cocktails like the Manhattan and Old Fashioned originally called for Rye whisky – because the rye bite was integral to the flavour profile of the drink. As Rye whiskies became rare in the US, many bartenders switched to Canadian Whiskies which, while a shadow of their pre-prohibition Rye-forward profiles, still generally retained a peculiar rye-ness of their own.

Once the Rye-forward Bourbons became popular, bartenders began to move again – partially due to the growing popularity of the Bourbon category but also due to the increasing blandness of most Canadian Whiskies – as Canadian whiskies continued to displace rye with corn.

More recently, with the reemergence of Rye whiskies, many mixologists are returning to the Rye roots of these cocktails – leaving the comparatively bland Canadians literally on the shelf.

Has Canadian Whisky lost its rightful place – and a distinct identity – as a base for cocktails? Or does the light and pleasant flavour make it more accessible and mixable? We’ve asked some of our notable bartender friends for their opinions – which we’ll get to in a bit. But first a little background on Canadian Whisky.

A Brief History

The first Canadian distillery (producing rum) was established in Quebec in 1769 – predating the establishment of Canada as a nation by almost 100 years. While it is not clear when the first whisky distillery was opened, by the 1840s there were over 200 distilleries producing spirits of all sorts in Canada.

read more


December 27th, 2010 - 8.00.am § in Champagne

Champagne Tastes: Part 3

Part 3 of our discussion with Jen Wall, the wine maker from Barefoot Cellars, producers of Barefoot Bubbly. KE: Is there any amount of time that a Champagne style wine should be aged as opposed to a regular wine? JW: Many folks like to age their wine, but the majority of wines are consumed within [.[...]


December 20th, 2010 - 8.00.am § in Champagne

Champagne Tastes: Part 2

Part 2 of our discussion with Jen Wall, the wine maker from Barefoot Cellars, producers of Barefoot Bubbly. KE: Let’s talk about the process for making Sparking wine. My understanding is that originally you basically took wine and put it in a bottle and added yeast to allow it to go through a [...]


December 13th, 2010 - 8.00.am § in Champagne, History

Champagne Tastes: Part 1

A discussion with Jen wall of BareFoot Wines and an overview of Champagne.[...]


October 18th, 2010 - 8.00.am § in Beer, Review

Can It. The Craft Beers of Oskar Blues

Most people don’t associate cans with great beer. Sure, most of the best-selling beers are available in cans, but craft beers generally avoid cans like the plague. This is the result of two common public misconceptions: Good beer comes in bottles and Beer tastes better in bottles. But six year[...]


October 11th, 2010 - 8.00.am § in History, Liqueur, Mixology

The low-down on Jäger

Ever heard that the Jägermeister label translates to “Oh Dear God” (the circle around the dear means “oh”…the deer is “dear” and the cross is “god”?) How about that there is deer blood is one of the secret ingredients? Apparently neither is[...]


October 4th, 2010 - 8.00.am § in Absinthe, History, Review

Absinthe: On the Rebound.

Absinthe has long been viewed as the bogey-man of alcoholic beverages. Vilified and made illegal in the US and most countries throughout Europe by 1915, it was only recently made legal again in the United States – though most European nations have allowed its sale since 1988. Why was it made i[...]